Working at Beverley Court Residential Home
334-336 Beverley Road, Hull, HU5 1LH
Operated by Hestoncourt Limited
30 bedsResidential homes
Workplace Score
5.8/10
AI analysis of latest data
Our AI workplace review
PlainSight AI Review
Last updated: 9 February 2026
Score: 5.8/10
Key Finding
"Passionate management, safe staffing, good training and team morale, but medicines not always stored or managed safely."
Safety & Risk
4/10
!
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to the ways people’s medicines were safely managed. People’s medicines were not always stored or managed safely.
Staff Culture
6/10
✓
Staff worked well as a team which supported their wellbeing and there was good staff morale. Staff told us they were happy to return to work after time off.
Staffing Levels
6/10
✓
Staffing levels were safe and supported staff to meet people’s needs in a timely manner. We received positive feedback form staff about staffing levels.
Training & Dev
6/10
✓
Staff were positive about the wide range of training they completed which supported them to meet people’s needs. Staff received regular support, supervision and appraisals.
Management
6/10
✓
The management team were passionate about their roles and regularly sought feedback from people, their relatives and staff with the aim of continuously improving the service.
Programmes
6/10
✓
A wide range of activities were available for people to join in with... Activities were personalised to people’s interests and life experiences. For example, one person was supported to visit a fishing museum.
Points to consider
Medication was not always stored or given out safely, like fridge too warm at times and missing double-checks on handwritten doses.
Some medicines were stored in the fridge however, on multiple occasions, records showed the fridge was above the required temperature... some hand-written medicine records had not been reviewed and signed by another member of staff.
Some risks to people were missed by managers, like not monitoring drinks enough for someone at risk of urine infections.
We found some risks had been overlooked. For example, one person was at risk of urine infections, and the risk of low fluid intake had not been assessed.
Not all staff skills were checked properly, like catheter care, even though training was in place.
We found some staff skills were not assessed, for example catheter care.
AI Generated
CQC Inspection Overview
CQC Inspection
Last inspected: August 2019
Good
Safe
✓
Good
Effective
✓
Good
Caring
✓
Good
Responsive
✓
Good
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Staff Reviews
Direct feedback from current and former employees
No one has reviewed yet. Be the first.
Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsAppSources
- Care Quality Commission (CQC) Inspection Data
- PlainSight staff reviews