Last updated: 9 February 2026
"Stable staffing and strong safety knowledge with good supervisions, but no activities programme and only basic training hold it back."
Staff understood how to protect people from poor care and abuse and received training on how to recognise and report abuse and they knew how to apply it.
The service had an open positive atmosphere and was very much people's homes.
There were enough staff employed at the service to meet people's needs. People were supported by a consistent staff team that had been at the service for a number of years.
Staff had the necessary skills and training to meet people's specific needs. For example, diabetes training.
Staff worked closely with the provider and had opportunities to discuss their role and performance through daily discussions and supervisions and appraisal.
Risks associated with people's care had been assessed including how to support people with risks associated with accessing their community safely and free from unnecessary restrictions.
No activities programme or coordinator, so the role is mostly routine personal care.
No activities, engagement programmes, or creative approaches detailed beyond basic community access.
Only standard training like diabetes management, no funded qualifications or career development.
Staff had the necessary skills and training to meet people's specific needs. For example, diabetes training.
AI Generated
Last inspected: April 2023
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp