Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Strong management and supportive culture, but limited activities and irregular staff supervision hold it back."
The provider's risk assessment and management procedures were robust. Care records included risk assessments in relation to people's care and support needs.
Staff we spoke with praised the management of the home. Comments included; 'It's the best run place I have worked in.' and 'The registered manager and deputy are very approachable. I have good support from the team.'
Staffing levels were sufficient to meet people's needs and preferences. We observed staff had time to respond to people.
The provider had a training programme for all staff. Staff were encouraged to develop their skills and achieve qualifications in care.
The home was well managed by a management team who were committed to achieving high-quality care for people. People living in the home, their relations and staff praised how well the home was managed.
Activities which reflected people's choices had been provided. This included recordings of ballets and concerts.
No activities coordinator or special programmes, just basic music and films, so the job is mostly routine personal care.
Activities which reflected people's choices had been provided. This included recordings of ballets and concerts.
Staff do not get supervision as often as the policy says.
Not all staff had received supervision as regularly as detailed in the providers procedure.
Recruitment checks are done but one record missed proof of the background check being returned.
one recruitment record we looked at did not have confirmation of the disclosure and barring check being returned.
AI Generated
Last inspected: January 2022
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp