Working at Annefield Grange
85 George Street, Ryde, PO33 2JE
Operated by Casa Di Cura Ltd
18 bedsResidential homes
Workplace Score
7.0/10
AI analysis of latest data
Our AI workplace review
PlainSight AI Review
Last updated: 9 February 2026
Score: 7.0/10
Key Finding
"Strong leadership, supportive team culture and proactive safety practices, although busy periods leave staff feeling rushed."
Safety & Risk
8/10
✓
There was a proactive and positive culture of safety based on openness and honesty. The Registered manager demonstrated they were open and transparent and learnt from any incidents, accidents or safeguarding events.
Staff Culture
8/10
✓
All staff we spoke with told us they enjoyed working in the service. One staff member said, 'I feel this is the best the home has been, I always leave work in a good mood.' Another said, 'We are a good and very supportive team, and feel we are valued by the management team.'
Staffing Levels
6/10
✓
We observed there were sufficient staff to safely meet people’s needs... although there were busier times, there appeared to be sufficient staff available to safely support people.
Training & Dev
6/10
✓
Staff had received training to equip them in their roles and this was further strengthened by specific supervision meetings... Staff had recently had training with the local community nurse team on monitoring people's health needs.
Management
8/10
✓
There was a strong and visible management team who led by example and promoted learning. The registered manager and/or deputy manager were present in the home every day of the week.
Programmes
6/10
✓
The provider employed an activities member of staff who supported people with a variety of activities including arts and craft, reading books of their choice, film afternoon, music and entertainment. People were also supported to go into the community.
Points to consider
Staff numbers are adequate but there are busy periods when staff feel rushed, especially on nights.
Sometimes they [staff] are rushed off their feet. Yes I do think there are enough staff but the 2 on nights are rushed.
Training covers basics like health monitoring and medicines checks with regular supervision, but no specialist courses or funded qualifications.
The registered manager monitored staff training and systems in place informed them when training was due to be refreshed. Staff received regular supervision which were focussed on specific topics.
Activities include a coordinator with crafts, films, music and outings, but no specialist programmes or therapeutic training for staff.
The provider employed an activities member of staff who supported people with a variety of activities including arts and craft, reading books of their choice, film afternoon, music and entertainment.
AI Generated
CQC Inspection Overview
CQC Inspection
Last inspected: September 2024
Good
Safe
✓
Good
Effective
✓
Good
Caring
✓
Good
Responsive
✓
Good
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Staff Reviews
Direct feedback from current and former employees
No one has reviewed yet. Be the first.
Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsAppSources
- Care Quality Commission (CQC) Inspection Data
- PlainSight staff reviews