Last updated: 9 February 2026
"Strong leadership, supportive culture and good training for staff, but a lack of activities programme lets it down."
Medicines were managed safely. Systems were in place to protect people from the risk of abuse.
Staff enjoyed working at the home. The management promoted a positive staff environment that was open and transparent.
There were enough staff working at the home to meet people's needs. People and staff told us there were enough staff on duty.
Staff had received training to meet the needs of people using the service. They had also received regular supervision and an appraisal of their work performance.
The registered manager demonstrated good visible leadership and understood their responsibilities. Staff felt that the working culture in the home was supportive.
We have made a recommendation regarding the provision of activities at the home. Professional feedback also highlighted concerns around the lack of activities taking place.
Little activities programme or coordinator, so the role is mostly routine personal care with few chances for creative engagement.
We have made a recommendation regarding the provision of activities at the home. Professional feedback also highlighted concerns around the lack of activities taking place.
Staffing is adequate but nothing special, with no info on low agency use or easy workloads to allow unhurried care.
There were enough staff working at the home to meet people's needs. People and staff told us there were enough staff on duty.
AI Generated
Last inspected: October 2022
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp