Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Strong management praised by staff and relatives plus excellent safety, but staffing lacks stable teams and training is only standard."
We saw risks were well managed, and people's medicines were managed safely. Staff had a good understanding of how to safeguard people from abuse. The registered manager monitored accidents, incidents and risks closely.
Staff said the service had improved since the last inspection. They told us the staff team worked well together and communication between staff had improved.
There were enough staff to support people safely, to ensure their needs were met and to engage with people in a positive and meaningful way.
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: We saw training and supervision records which indicated that staff had received appropriate training and supervision and appraisals of their work.
We received very positive feedback about the management and leadership of the service from people we spoke with. This included people's relatives, staff and other professionals. One relative said, '[The registered manager] is amazing.'
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: The home employed an activity co-ordinator who ensured people received social stimulation and meaningful activities. Relatives said, 'Whenever I visit, there's always something going on.'
Staff numbers are enough for safety and basic engagement but no info on stable teams or easy workloads.
There were enough staff to support people safely, to ensure their needs were met and to engage with people in a positive and meaningful way.
Only standard training and supervisions mentioned, no specialist courses or funded qualifications.
Per 2019 comprehensive inspection: staff had received appropriate training and supervision and appraisals of their work.
AI Generated
Last inspected: December 2020
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp