Working at Abbeyfield House - Stockport
120 Moss Lane, Stockport, SK7 1EE
Operated by Abbeyfield Society (The)
16 bedsResidential homes
Workplace Score
5.5/10
AI analysis of latest data
Our AI workplace review
PlainSight AI Review
Last updated: 9 February 2026
Score: 5.5/10
Key Finding
"Staff feel supported by an approachable manager with enough staff and varied activities, but no registered manager in post yet."
Safety & Risk
6/10
✓
People were receiving their medicine as prescribed... However, the records did not always provide sufficient information... This was discussed with the manager who took immediate action to implement an appropriate system.
Staff Culture
6/10
✓
Staff spoke positively about working at Abbeyfield House and positively about the support they received from the home manager. One staff member commented, '[The manager] is very approachable and very fair.'
Staffing Levels
6/10
✓
There were sufficient staff employed to meet people's needs. People, relatives and staff all felt there were sufficient staff to meet people's needs and any shortfalls were met through teamwork.
Training & Dev
5/10
!
Staff were supported to access a variety of training, had regular supervision... There were some areas of training where compliance needed improving and this was discussed with the manager.
Management
4/10
!
At the time of our inspection there was not a registered manager in post. The home manager had begun the process of registering with us.
Programmes
6/10
✓
There was an activity worker in place and a range of activities was available... young people visited from a local school, and members of religious groups completed monthly visits.
Points to consider
No permanent manager registered yet, which could affect oversight stability.
At the time of our inspection there was not a registered manager in post. The home manager had begun the process of registering with us.
Only standard training offered, with some areas having low completion rates.
There were some areas of training where compliance needed improving and this was discussed with the manager.
Staffing is adequate and unhurried but relies on teamwork to cover any shortfalls.
There were sufficient staff employed to meet people's needs... and any shortfalls were met through teamwork.
AI Generated
CQC Inspection Overview
CQC Inspection
Last inspected: December 2023
Good
Safe
✓
Good
Effective
✓
Good
Caring
✓
Good
Responsive
✓
Good
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Staff Reviews
Direct feedback from current and former employees
No one has reviewed yet. Be the first.
Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsAppSources
- Care Quality Commission (CQC) Inspection Data
- PlainSight staff reviews