Last updated: 10 February 2026
"Praised management and strong staff teamwork, but no activities programme and regular agency staff hold it back."
Systems were in place to manage and monitor safeguarding concerns. Risks were assessed and reviewed regularly. Medicines were managed safely and effectively.
One relative told us, 'Staff see to everyone as they go past them, even If they are on their way to someone else, people all get attention. The staff show teamwork.'
There were enough staff to provide safe support to people. The registered manager told us they used the same agency staff for continuity of care [...] 'plenty of staff, and regular agency (familiar agency staff).'
Staff had completed safeguarding training and were confident to report any safeguarding concerns. Staff undertook medicines training and their competency was regularly assessed.
Relatives spoke highly of the management [...] 'The service is well run, even though the staff have changed over the years, and I do not know them all, but the teamwork is still there. The management run the service the same way as they did before.'
No activities, engagement or creative approaches mentioned at all in the report.
Adequate staffing levels but regular use of agency staff, even familiar ones.
'There are always 2 or 3 staff there, plenty of staff, and regular agency (familiar agency staff).'
Only standard mandatory training like safeguarding and medicines, no specialist courses or funded qualifications.
Staff had completed safeguarding training [...] staff undertook medicines training and their competency was regularly assessed.
No activities programme or coordinator, so the role is mostly routine personal care.
No activities, engagement or creative approaches mentioned at all.
AI Generated
Last inspected: May 2023
Management Quality
Well-led: Good
Direct feedback from current and former employees

Scan the QR code or tap the button to chat with us on WhatsApp. Your identity stays completely anonymous.
Chat on WhatsApp